HumanTyped for X creators
Put process evidence directly under the post it supports.
A social post is short, public, and easy to challenge after publication. HumanTyped creates a receipt while the post is written so the evidence can travel with it instead of appearing only after a dispute.
Built for short public text
The workflow focuses on posts rather than requiring a long academic document or Google Docs history.
Evidence stays attached
The receipt link can be shared directly under the original post where readers need the context.
No detector badge
HumanTyped presents session evidence and limitations instead of assigning an AI probability to the copy.
A simple publishing flow
Start with a blank HumanTyped session and write the post in the controlled editor. Review the replay visibility before sealing, then let the server reconstruct the final text and issue the signed receipt.
After publishing the main post to X, share the receipt in the same thread. Readers keep the post as the primary object and can open the receipt only when they want to inspect the process evidence.
What the audience sees
A public receipt can show the sealed post, evidence score, duration, edit count, reconstruction state, signature status, and the replay allowed by the creator's privacy choice. It also repeats the boundary that the process is evidence rather than identity proof.
The receipt is not a public dump of every private signal. Raw operations, private scoring features, OAuth credentials, and account-only controls stay away from public routes and analytics.
When to use it
Use a receipt for original commentary, reporting notes, personal essays, launch statements, or posts likely to prompt questions about how they were prepared. It can also support a voluntary transparency practice for creators who sometimes use AI and want to distinguish assisted and unassisted work.
Do not use the receipt as a weapon against another writer or as a guarantee that your post is true. Provenance can explain how text developed in one environment; it does not replace evidence for the claims inside that text.
Evidence, not certainty