Product limitations
The blind spots belong next to the evidence, not in the fine print.
A writing receipt becomes misleading when readers assume it observed more than one controlled session. HumanTyped publishes a narrow claim so the remaining uncertainty stays visible.
No identity proof
An authenticated account and an observed session do not establish which person physically performed every action.
No complete environment view
Phones, paper, other computers, conversations, and unrecorded preparation remain outside the browser's observation.
No truth or ownership decision
Process evidence does not fact-check claims, search for copied sources, or determine copyright and contractual rights.
Retyping and outside assistance
A person can consult text produced elsewhere and type it manually into the controlled editor. The resulting session may contain natural-looking edits while the ideas or wording originated outside HumanTyped. The receipt must therefore never claim an absolute absence of AI.
The same limitation applies to dictation, memorization, paper notes, editorial coaching, and conversations. A disclosure and supporting source trail can address those influences more honestly than trying to infer them from typing behavior.
Identity and intent
HumanTyped accounts can authenticate access, but the product does not perform biometric typing identification and does not reuse session rhythms to recognize people. It cannot establish that the named account holder personally entered every character.
The system also cannot determine why edits were made, whether a writer understood the text, or whether a session was created to mislead. Those questions require context and human investigation outside the receipt.
Content quality and legal questions
A perfectly reconstructed text can still be false, defamatory, unsafe, plagiarized, or contractually restricted. Receipts do not evaluate citations, originality, source licensing, research quality, or compliance with an employer, school, platform, or publisher policy.
Treat the receipt as one technical record. Combine it with identity evidence when needed, source verification, plagiarism review, editorial judgment, disclosures, and an appropriate appeal or legal process for consequential decisions.
Evidence, not certainty